London Food Strategy
- London Development Agency, London Food, Mayor of London and others
- Start date:
- October 2004
- May 2006
Brook Lyndhurst was responsible for researching and drafting the London Mayor's food strategy and for introducing amendments resulting from the public consultation on the document.
Working with a large number of partners, including the Government Office for London, health authorities and the London Assembly, we drew on a huge range of material to paint a complete picture of the state of the food system in London. This enabled London Food and other stakeholders to easily identify priority areas for action, which were then translated into the final strategy. More specifically, the project entailed:
A large scale literature review
We assembled and analysed almost 300 documents encompassing both academic and grey literature as well as policy documents and strategies from other sectors (e.g. the London Plan) and regions.
Developing a conceptual framework
In order to analyse London's food system in a way that could translate into meaningful, actionable conclusions for policy, we broke down the food chain into eight component parts encompassing everything from where food is grown (e.g. production) to its sale, consumption and disposal.
The Food Strategy dealt with a number of difficult issues and Brook Lyndhurst played a key role in facilitating discussions between a wide variety of stakeholders to iron out challenging questions in a spirit of cooperation and compromise.
Over 1,000 separate comments were received on the first draft of the strategy during the consultation phase. Brook Lyndhurst was responsible for integrating these into the final draft and for maintaining an audit trail to ensure transparency about the way in which comments were dealt with.
Brook Lyndhurst was responsible for scoring possible actions to create an indicative action plan for the draft strategy and for running a workshop to assist partners in producing a full implementation plan after the publication of the main document.
The range of partners in this project meant that effective communication was essential. During presentations we ensured that we provided concise information which was clearly outlined and then summarised by the presenter. We also adopted similar techniques in written reports – for example, including regular summaries of key points together with effective linking of ideas, cross-referencing and bulleted conclusions and recommendations - to enable readers to prioritise the elements that required most attention.
The strategy remains 'live' under the new Mayor and the work of London Food continues under the chair of Rosie Boycott.
“We do not learn from experience… We learn from reflecting on experience.” (John Dewey) The strength of participatory action research (PAR) is that the role of the researcher includes being a facilitator of change. PAR seeks to understand the world while trying to change it, collaboratively and reflectively. In this blog, I briefly explore some [...]
Drawing distinctions between ‘change in attitude’, ‘change in behaviour’ and ‘one-off material change’ may miss out important pieces of the overall picture. The Energy Cultures team at CSAFE, have developed an ‘Energy Cultures Framework’. This framework brings together Cognitive norms (including attitudes), Practices (behaviour) and Material Culture, and suggests that these elements can all be interlinked and reinforce one another...
Alongside the questionnaire FutureFest goers were asked to reflect on what they wanted to be before growing up. Through playing with Lego we explored why participants wanted to be what it was they wanted to be and the barriers and enablers they had encountered along the way. 83 participants took part in our ‘experiment’. Collectively [...]