Household waste prevention evidence review
- Start date:
- October 2008
- October 2009
A synthesis review to draw together findings from past research in order to provide an accurate and up-to-date picture of existing policy-relevant evidence about waste prevention and associated pro-environmental behaviour in the UK.
In 2009 Defra’s Waste and Resources Evidence Programme (WREP) was entering its fifth year of providing, interpreting, analysing and disseminating research and wider waste and resources evidence. In the early years, household waste prevention was highlighted as a particular area of focus because there was a significant gap in evidence to underpin policy making in this area.
Since that time, WREP has commissioned a comprehensive portfolio of research projects exploring household waste prevention and waste-related behaviour. The scope varied from understanding consumer behaviour in relation to household waste prevention, through evaluating how different initiatives work in practice, to the development of technical solutions. Most of these projects are now either complete or are in the course of completion. A list of these projects can be found at http://randd.defra.gov.uk/.
This synthesis review was commissioned by Defra's WREP to draw together the findings from this research and those of related evidence work commissioned elsewhere in Defra, by WRAP, the Environment Agency and others. The key aim was to provide an accurate and up-to-date picture of existing policy-relevant evidence about waste prevention and associated pro-environmental behaviour in the UK. Brook Lyndhurst (lead contractor), Social Marketing Practice and the Resource Recovery Forum were commissioned to undertake this project.
The objectives of the research were:
- To undertake a comprehensive literature review of existing evidence in order to provide an up to date picture of existing policy-relevant evidence on waste prevention in the UK;
- To work closely with policy and a wide network of stakeholders to ensure expert input to the research, analysis and policy development process;
- To undertake in-depth analysis of up to 50 sources of literature against a robust analytical framework; and
- To provide a series of tailored, policy-relevant reports and briefings that synthesise existing evidence, the gaps, future priorities, the role of stakeholders and conclusions and recommendations.
The outputs from the review (see Defra website for full list of outputs) have been organised into a series of modules that allow for the evidence to be accessed at three different levels of detail, and different packages, depending on the interests of the reader. Before accessing individual documents generated by this review, the reader should first open the 'guide to reading the reports' document to gain an overview of the different modules and their titles. The structure is an acknowledgement that not all readers will be interested in all of the material. The intention is that users can drill down from the executive level reports (L1 m0 and L1 m1) to the particular detail of interest.
The level 2 modules, entitled 'Overview', are synthesis reports which cover different aspects of waste prevention and group the research under various topic headings. These level 2 modules are supported by level 3 documents; 'concise briefing notes' which provide short, technical briefs on specific topics, and 'detailed briefing notes' which offer more in-depth insight. An extensive bibliography is included in the document list (L3 m8/2) as a record of all the research accessed and reviewed in this study.
I had the pleasure of joining some 300 researchers and academics from around the world a couple of weeks ago to discuss the latest thinking on persuading consumers to use less energy. The BEHAVE2014 conference took place in Oxford at a time when it is increasingly appreciated, by businesses, governments and civic society, that any [...]
We had a conversation in the office the other day about herd behaviour and the difference between football and cricket crowds. Why is it that spectators at a football match can occasionally get aggressive and abusive, but spectators at a cricket match tend to act more like naughty schoolboys: boisterous but essentially good-natured? It’s a [...]