Evaluation of the Big Green Challenge Plus
- Start date:
- July 2009
- December 2010
Big Green Challenge Plus was a fund run by the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA). BGC+ followed NESTA’s original Big Green Challenge prize, which supported community-based carbon reduction schemes through an innovative, competition-based approach (Brook Lyndhurst also carried out the evaluation for the Big Green Challenge).
Through BGC+, the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) made small grants of up to £20,000 available to 17 of the original applicants to the Big Green Challenge. The aim, as with the original fund, was to support innovative community-based initiatives in reducing the carbon emissions within their target communities.
The goal of the evaluation was to explore the approaches to community engagement employed by the projects to identify what works and what might be improved in future projects, focusing in particular on models which can be replicated elsewhere or which can be scaled up to reach larger audiences.
The methodology employed to evaluate BGC+ reflected the size of the grants awarded through the fund and the need to limit the burden placed upon projects, while identifying key lessons for future funds. It comprised:
- An initial review of applications and other project documents;
- A round of site visits, allowing us to familiarise ourselves with the work of projects on the ground;
- Review of evaluation materials submitted by projects over the course of the fund;
- An online questionnaire to be completed by projects;
- Interviews with NESTA's partners in administering the fund - UnLtd and CRed; and
- A second round of site visits at the end of the fund.
A final report was written at the end of the fund in late 2010.
I had the pleasure of joining some 300 researchers and academics from around the world a couple of weeks ago to discuss the latest thinking on persuading consumers to use less energy. The BEHAVE2014 conference took place in Oxford at a time when it is increasingly appreciated, by businesses, governments and civic society, that any [...]
We had a conversation in the office the other day about herd behaviour and the difference between football and cricket crowds. Why is it that spectators at a football match can occasionally get aggressive and abusive, but spectators at a cricket match tend to act more like naughty schoolboys: boisterous but essentially good-natured? It’s a [...]